optionality and common sense (why i returned to starburst)

i’m so excited to have returned to starburst and be focused on rebooting the devrel function, not to mention staying active in the trino and iceberg communities — long live the icehouse

iceberg acid transactions with partitions (a behind the scenes perspective)

a port of my prior post taking a deeper look at what happens under the hood of hive with “acid” transactions — this time on iceberg tables with parquet files

develop, deploy, execute & monitor in one tool (welcome to apache nifi)

for those not familiar with apache nifi, come on a short overview of how this framework rather uniquely spans so many of the phases of the typical software development lifecycle

iceberg snapshots affect storage footprint (not performance)

it is easy to understand why most folks initially imagine that iceberg’s ability to maintain a long history of snapshots will cause performance problems, but that is not the case — the real gotcha is that keeping many versions can quickly consume 2-10+ times the amount of data lake storage space

well designed partitions aid iceberg compaction (call them ice cubes)

despite what you may have heard, partitions are not dead (yes, there are multiple tools in the shed) and using a well-defined partitioning strategy with apache iceberg can help prevent concurrency issues when compacting files

iceberg materialized views in galaxy (no más storage_schema)

starburst galaxy, as a saas offering, just keeps slipping in nice bits of features & functionality — this one tackles hiding the underlying storage table of an iceberg materialized view